What’s the best type of cylinder bore finish for today’s engines? Most would say it’s a finish that allows the rings to seat quickly and completely so the engine doesn’t use oil. For many applications, that may mean a plateau finish. The surface finish must also meet the piston ring manufacturer’s specifications and have the proper crosshatch so the cylinder walls will retain oil and provide adequate lubrication for the rings. The finish must also be relatively free of torn and folded metal (swarf) as well as abrasive residue.
Also important is bore geometry. The hole should be as round as possible with little or no taper or variation vertically. Bore distortion caused by deflections in the casting or improper boring or honing techniques will have an adverse effect on ring sealing and blow-by.
The OEMs and ring manufacturers have developed very specific surface finish and bore geometry specifications for their engines and rings. The recommendations vary somewhat depending on the engine application, type of rings, and honing procedure used. But, generally, engine rebuilders should strive to achieve a finish that meets all of the criteria we’ve just described.
To better understand what these requirements are, let’s take a close look at the surface of the cylinder bore itself.
To the naked eye, a freshly honed cylinder bore looks pretty rough in comparison to a used cylinder bore. Honing leaves a scratched surface that should show a strong crosshatch pattern. A used cylinder, on the other hand, will have a smooth polished appearance with much less crosshatch visible depending on how much the cylinder is worn.
At a microscopic level, the profile of a freshly honed cylinder wall reveals many little peaks and valleys. The valleys are cut out of the metal by the abrasives during the honing process, and the peaks represent the highest point on the surface that will make contact with the rings.
Large, sharp peaks won’t last long once the engine is started because the tops of the peaks will be gradually sheared off by the rings as the rings break in. As the tallest peaks are knocked off, the “mountains” become flattened creating a “plateau” effect. This increases the bearing area for the rings and makes it easier for the rings to glide over the surface on a film of oil that is retained in the valleys.
According to one ring manufacturer we interviewed, once the rings have seated, wear virtually ceases because the rings are now supported by a thin film of oil and do not make physical contact with the cylinder wall. The ideal cylinder bore surface, therefore, should essentially duplicate this condition. By using the right honing procedure, you can create a surface finish that allows the rings to seat quickly with minimal wear and which will retain the proper amount of oil so the rings receive proper lubrication.
By the numbers
To minimize the formation of sharp peaks on the surface, the cylinders must be finish honed with stones that have a relatively fine grit size. The finer the grit size, the smoother the finish.
The average roughness of the surface is called “RA” and is typically specified in microinches (one microinch is one millionth of an inch, or 0.000001″). To measure RA exactly, you need an electronic instrument called a profilometer. A profilometer drags a diamond-tipped stylus across the surface to measure the size and distribution of peaks and valleys.
Most OEMs and ring manufacturers specify a surface finish of 15 to 25 RA for moly faced rings, which can be achieved by finish honing with #280 grit stones. Cast iron and chrome rings can tolerate a somewhat rougher surface finish (20 to 35 RA), so coarser #220 grit stones can be used to produce this type of finish.
Unfortunately, RA alone doesn’t reveal much about the actual profile of the cylinder bore surface. A bore finish with tall peaks and deep valleys can have the same average roughness number as one with short peaks and shallow valleys. More measurements are needed to accurately analyze the surface. These include:
•RPK – the peak height;
•RVK – the depth of the valleys; and
•RK – the average core roughness depth based on the RPK and RVK measurements. A surface with a low RK value will have long life characteristics.
•RMAX is the highest peak-to-valley measurement taken from five samples.
•RZ is the mean highest peak-to-valley measurement taken from five samples.
When all these numbers are taken together, it creates a more complete picture of what the surface finish actually looks like. Some profilometers can take this information and plot a graph that shows how much bearing area is on the surface. This is called the “Abbott-Firestone Curve.” The curve plots profile height on the vertical axis and percent of surface contact on the horizontal scale. The flatter the curve and the greater the area enclosed by the curve, the better the surface finish.
An easier way to tell whether or not the surface finish has all the “right” numbers is to compare the various “R” numbers to the OEM and ring manufacturers’ specifications. The numbers will tell you if the surface has the proper depth of crosshatch, enough bearing area to properly support the rings, and is smooth enough to minimize ring wear during the seating process.
According to one honing equipment manufacturer’s guidelines, the RMAX and RZ numbers should be about 10 times the RA number for a properly honed finish. If the RMAX or RZ numbers are less than one seventh the RA number, the surface is “glazed” and won’t retain oil properly. If RMAX or RZ is more than 12 times the RA number, the surface has too many deep scratches.
What are “good” numbers for a properly honed cylinder bore? Sunnen offers the following guidelines:
•RA should be 12 to 24;
•RPK 6 to 24;
•RVK 20 to 80; and
•RK 28 to 48
John Scott of Perfect Circle Piston Rings says the numbers will vary depending on the honing procedure used. Perfect Circle’s finish specifications for automotive engines honed with a single stage process are:
•RA 10 to 20;
•RPK 10 to 20;
•RVK 30 to 60; and
•RK 25 to 50.
Another useful tool for evaluating surface finish is “fax film.” Though few rebuilders use this technique, most OEMs, as well as some PERs, find it is extremely helpful for identifying certain types of surface finish problems.
After the cylinders have been honed and washed, a small piece of thin plastic film is placed on a bore surface with a solvent that softens the film. This allows the film to take an impression of the bore surface.
The film is then removed and examined under a microscope at 100X magnification to check for excessive torn or folded metal, burnishing or glazing, embedded particles and debris. It also makes it easy to accurately measure the exact angle of the crosshatch.
Most OEMs and ring manufacturers say the angle of the scratches in the crosshatch pattern should be about 45° to each other, or about 22° to 32° to the horizontal deck surface. The crosshatch angle should be the same throughout the length of the cylinder and not flatten out at either end.
If the crosshatch angle is too steep, the rings can pump oil or experience excessive rotation which will accelerate wear in the rings and piston lands. If the crosshatch angle is too shallow, it can have a ratcheting effect as the rings pass over the valleys, preventing the rings from receiving proper lubrication.
A proper crosshatch will also have enough valleys to retain oil, but not too much oil. The secret here is getting the right amount of retained oil volume (Vo). If the crosshatch scratches are too deep or there are too many valleys (not enough peaks and bearing area), the engine will use excessive oil.
The greater the retained oil volume, the higher the oil consumption. This can be caused by finish honing with stones that are too coarse (#150 or less). On the other hand, if the crosshatch scratches are too shallow or there is too much plateau on the bore surface, the volume of retained oil may not be enough to keep the rings lubricated; this will cause accelerated ring and cylinder wear. This can be caused by finish honing with stones that are too fine (#400 or greater).
A plateau cylinder bore finish is a popular one because it combines all the “good” numbers: low peak height (RPK); plenty of bearing area (Abbott-Firestone curve); and adequate valley crosshatch (RVK) for good oil retention and proper ring lubrication.
To achieve a plateau finish, one of two methods can be used: a two-step honing procedure or a one-step honing procedure, followed by a brief brushing process.
With the two-step plateau honing procedure, the cylinder is honed with coarse to medium stones followed by a very fine abrasive for a few strokes to remove only the tops of the peaks. For example, the cylinder would first be honed with #150, #220 or #280 grit stones followed by a few strokes with #400 grit stones.
The trick here is to shave only the peaks off the cylinder walls. You don’t want to remove too much metal with the finer stones or you will be down to the base metal and lose all or much of the required valley depth in the crosshatch.
The second way to produce a plateau finish is to hone the cylinders with #220 or #280 grit abrasive (or #400 or #500 grit diamond abrasive), followed by a few strokes with a “Plateau Honing Tool” or “Flex-Hone” tool. There are both engine rebuilders and diamond hone head suppliers, however, who say that a proper surface finish can be achieved through just the use of diamond honing without a separate step utilizing a plateau honing tool.
The Plateau Honing Tool or Osborn brush has silicon carbide abrasive embedded in nylon bristles. The brushes are designed for mounting in a hone head so pressure and feed rate can be controlled.
A plateau effect is created as the brush sweeps across the surface to remove sharp peaks and other debris. The amount of metal removed is minimal because the tool is only applied for a few strokes in each cylinder.
The Flex-Hone tool (manufactured by Brush Research Mfg. Co., Inc.) has numerous round abrasive balls mounted on wire bristles. The tool is typically mounted in a hand drill and manually stroked up and down in each cylinder bore a few times to plateau the surface. This style of brush has a more aggressive cutting action than the nylon bristle tool, but is only used to remove just a small amount of material to plateau the surface.
Opinions differ as to which type of brush gives the best plateau effect and why, but both types are used successfully by a wide variety of engine rebuilders to “precondition” cylinders and improve the overall bore finish.
The advantages of a plateau finish, regardless of how it’s achieved are:
•Significantly shorter break-in time;
•Reduced blow-by for cleaner emissions;
•Reduced oil consumption in a new engine; and
•Less ring and bore wear for improved engine longevity.
According to research by Perfect Circle, a plateaued bore surface will stabilize after about two hours of running. In other words, the rings will seat very quickly and experience almost no further wear. A more conventional surface finish, by comparison, may take anywhere from three to 12 hours to seat in depending on the grade of stones used. A bore finish honed with #280 grit stones will seat faster than one finished with #220 stones.
When cylinders are bored to oversize, they are generally bored or rough honed to within about .0025″ to .003″ of final size to allow for finish honing. The finish honing step removes the fractured and torn metal created by the boring process, and produces the kind of surface finish and crosshatch we’ve been talking about.
Whether vitrified abrasives or metal bond diamond or CBN (cubic boron nitride) stones are used to finish hone the cylinders makes no difference as long as the final surface geometry conforms to the desired numbers.
Most OEMs and production engine rebuilders use diamond to hone cylinders because it improves consistency and reduces honing costs.
A set of diamond stones will typically do 20,000 to 100,000 cylinder bores compared to maybe 50 to 80 cylinders for a set of vitrified stones. Diamond stones are much more expensive than vitrified abrasives, but over the long run actually cost less, especially when labor savings are factored in (provided you don’t damage or break a stone!). Because diamond wears very little, the honing process takes less babysitting and yields more consistent results, according to those we interviewed.
The honing characteristics of diamond honing stones have also improved in recent years due to changes made to the matrix that supports the diamond. Some stones now use a titanium surface treatment that slows the erosion of the supporting matrix. This improves the cutting action of the stone, which in turn reduces the tendency of diamond to “plow” through the metal. The result is less torn and folded debris on the surface and a better overall surface finish.
Many small shops are making the transition to diamond honing too because of the advantages it offers. But for some, diamond honing may not be the best way to go. Because diamond stones wear so slowly, the stones do not conform very quickly to changes in bore diameters. So if a shop is honing a variety of different bore sizes with the same hone head, they may not get as good a finish as they’d get honing the same sized bores over and over again.
Also, some diamond hone heads can only handle a limited range in bore sizes so you may have to shop for a hone head with a wider range in bore sizes, or buy a second hone head.
Andy Rottler of Rottler Manufacturing says 90% of his honing machines and honing heads are now being sold with diamond stones. He estimates that probably 75% of all the engines that are being rebuilt today are being diamond honed.
“The most common procedures are to use #400 or #500 grit diamond stones, which may be followed by a nylon abrasive brush to plateau the finish,” explained Rottler. “The #500 stones typically leave a finish in the 18 to 22 RA range, while the #400 stones leave a 24 to 30 RA finish which requires brushing to bring the RA down to about 20.”
Ray Fink of AER in Carrollton, TX, a large production remanufacturer that is a contract engine remanufacturer for Ford, General Motors and Nissan, says AER uses a two-step diamond honing process on almost all of its engines. AER rebuilds more than 400 engines per day at three different plant locations.
“After the cylinders have been bored with a CNC boring bar, they are diamond honed on machines to remove the fractured metal and crosshatch the bores. The bores are then plateau finished using vitrified stones in our honing machines,” said Fink. “We currently do not use a brush or plateau honing tool to finish the cylinders.”
Bob Jones of Jones Automotive Engines, Inc. in Spokane, WA, says his company rebuilds 25 to 30 engines a day. “We’ve been using a two-step diamond honing procedure for about five years,” said Jones. “After the cylinders have been bored to within .0025″ to .003″ of final size, we use a #270 to #325 diamond to rough hone the cylinders to within .001″ of final size. We then finish with a #500 grit diamond. This procedure gives us a consistent surface finish in the 17 to 22 RA range.”
Jones said he is considering changing to a one-step diamond honing process and using a brush to plateau the cylinders, but he has not yet fully evaluated the process.
“One thing we’ve found with diamond honing is that harder blocks like Chrysler 383 and 440 engines are too hard for rough honing with #325 diamond, so we use #270 diamond to get a better finish,” said Jones.
Though we’re not yet seeing many all-aluminum engines in the aftermarket, a growing number of engines with all-aluminum blocks (no liners) are being built by the OEMs. Tim Meara of Sunnen says both Mercedes and Porsche have aluminum blocks that use an alloy similar to that used by Chevrolet in the Vega engine years ago. The 390 alloy has a high silicone content that provides wear resistance.
Honing this type of alloy requires a four-step process. First the bores are honed with a #220 vitrified abrasive, followed by #400 stones and finally #600 stones. The cylinders are then finished by lapping with cork and a special lapping compound that removes just enough aluminum to expose the harder silicone particles.
Meara says a different procedure must be used on Honda Prelude aluminum blocks because the cylinders are fiber reinforced. On these engines, a two-step procedure is used. The cylinders are first honed with #280 grit stones, followed by #400 stones. No lapping is required.
As important as surface finish is for proper ring seating and lubrication, bore geometry is probably even more important on today’s engines. Bore distortion is common in the upper cylinder area because of the forces created by the head bolts when they are tightened down. Changes in coolant temperature and circulation within the block can also cause bore distortion as can normal and abnormal combustion pressures. To get as round a hole as possible, many engines with thinwall castings should be honed with a torque plate and head gasket bolted to the block. The torque plate simulates the loads placed on the block when the head is installed, allowing the bore to be honed to truer dimensions.
Bore distortion can be described by levels of “order.” A first order bore is one that is perfectly round with no distortion in any direction. A second order bore is one with an oval distortion, typically caused by machining errors or heat transfer. Rings can usually tolerate some second order distortion by conforming to the bore. But the lower the ring tension, the less able the rings are to conform to bore distortion. A third order distortion results in a triangular shaped hole, and is usually caused by a combination of second and fourth order distortions. A fourth order distortion is a bore with a cloverleaf or squared shape. This type of distortion is caused by the location of the head bolts.The amount of distortion can vary from almost nothing up to a couple thousandths of an inch! With today’s tight piston-to-wall clearances, even .0005″ of bore distortion may be too much on some applications. So the rounder the bore the better.
Some performance engine builders don’t want to see less than plus or minus 8 microns (0.000003″) of bore distortion! Perfect Circle says a plateau finish should only be used if bore distortion is less than 0.01 mm (.0004″).
Click here for a chart on Common Deviatins From a Good Bore Finish.
To wrap up our article on bore finish, we need to say a few words about cleanliness. All your efforts to produce an ideal bore finish, crosshatch and near perfect geometry can be undone if the cylinders are not thoroughly cleaned after they’ve been honed.
Scrubbing with hot, soapy water is still one of the best ways to remove honing debris that can cause ring problems if it remains in the cylinders. Some rebuilders tell us they even do a second cleaning step that involves wiping out each cylinder with ATF or WD-40 oil to remove anything that might have been missed by the soapy water.
And finally, for optimum assurance of proper surface finish and bore geometry, many rebuilders also vacuum test the cylinders to make sure the rings are giving the proper seal after the engine has been assembled.
Latest posts by Larry Carley (see all)
- Just in Time – Addressing Timing Component Replacement and Upgrades - Apr 10, 2014
- Weighing in on Balancing Work - Mar 7, 2014
- Pick-a-Part: Selecting Valvetrain Components for a Performance Build - Mar 6, 2014