The Spintron was developed by Bob Fox at Trend Performance in the ‘90s to improve pushrods for race teams. Engine speeds were increasing dramatically in those days, especially in NASCAR and Pro Stock, and Fox needed a deeper insight into the how, why, and when of pushrod failure. Working with Randy Dorton of Hendrick Motorsports, his rigorous testing led to one of the most significant reversals of conventional wisdom that had been religiously accepted at the time: a lighter valvetrain is better.

“I think the most important lesson we learned was that bigger is almost always better,” says Steve Rhodey, general manager at Trend Performance. “The stigma for valve train is that the lighter it is the better, but we’ve been able to prove that on the side of the fulcrum, the larger diameter and wall thickness has always been better. It’s more stable and it’s never inhibited the valve train in any way, shape, or form.”

The Spintron revealed massive pushrod flex in those days, especially during high-rpm running. Racers were changing their tuning not knowing that the pushrod was indiscriminately altering the cam timing, which altered the distributor timing. With further testing the Spintron exposed even more valvetrain issues.

“They thought they had a tune-up issue, but actually in fact their valve springs were too heavy or the valves were too heavy or they were having an issue with the rocker arm ratios and so on and so forth,” explains Rhodey. “We were able to bring it to the table, dial it all in together, get the best combination to let those parts run in sync.”

What is a Spintron and how does it work?
From the outside, it looks like a regular engine bolted up large, multi-sided metal case. The engine, however, is somewhat of a dummy as the rotating assembly has been removed in favor of a straight mandrel (in place of the crank) connected to an electric motor inside the Spintron case. The motor and mandrel turn the engine’s timing set at various speeds so that data about the valvetrain dynamics can be gathered by a high-speed laser camera as well as other sensors. A dedicated lubrication system keeps the valvetrain oiled during testing.

There are two types of Spintrons: a gear-reduction model that is used most often for valvetrain testing and a direct-drive version with a more-powerful motor that will spin a fully assembled engine. The latter model is used to analyze lubrication and frictional-loss issues.

The Spintron can be fitted with sensors to monitor load and strain on various components in addition to temperature and pressure where needed. The most informative valvetrain analysis comes from the high-speed laser camera that is positioned in one cylinder through a hole in the cylinder block. It’s pointed directly up at the head of the valve to record movement at up 4,000 frames a second. Combined with the other sensors and sophisticated software, the laser tracks valve moment in relation to crankshaft and cam positions.

A step test helps engineers observe valvetrain differences at low and high speeds. The Spintron can also be programmed to replicate the actual engine rpm during a race to test the durability of each component. Simulating thousands of race miles, including shifting and pit stops, gives engineers a clearer insight into weakness or design flaws of these parts.

“It’ll show that in live data, it’s basically a curve. You’ll see where the valve is closed and max lift where it’s opened,” says Rhodey. “Then you’ll see it shutting on the other side. You get a baseline at idle, and then as we ramp up the rpm, you can actually watch the wave. You can figure out if it’s opening too soon, if it’s flying over the nose, or if it’s slamming shut. You can see that in a trace.”

It was in the earliest years of Spintron testing that Trend determined a lighter pushrod was almost always not the solution. The Spintron proved time and time again that deflection was costing engines valve lift, and most importantly, horsepower. Despite years of validation since those tests in the ‘90s, there are still engine builders who remain firm on a lighter pushrod.

Engine builders who have used the Spintron often discover that even the minutest changes to a cam or rocker arm can greatly impact other parts of the valvetrain. So when a major change is made to the pushrod, it also impacts other components.

Valve bounce and lofting are other unlocked discoveries gleaned from Spintron testing. Engine builders had long suspected the notion that the valve would literally bounce off the seat during closing in high-speed operation, but there was never any live data to substantiate it until the Spintron. Once the extent of the problem was documented, engineers could make adjustments or substitute parts to minimize the problem.

Lofting was somewhat an unexpected but rewarding discovery. As engine speeds increase, the lifter can lose contact with the camshaft lobe. Literally, it’s thrown or lofted over the nose of the cam lobe. The result is that the valve remains open a little longer and the overall valve lift is a little higher than the original cam profile intended. Once engine builders got a handle on this dynamic, they were able to use it to their advantage.

Racers have found they can basically trick the engines into more lift by weakening the valve train, purposely putting it into deflection. Lofting has turned out to be a useful tool for classes where rules limit valve lift or where flat-tappet lifters are required and cam lobe design is restricted. Again, testing on the Spintron will validate an engine builder’s theories on manipulating the valvetrain.

For teams that need the engine to last a 24-hour road race or a 600-mile high-speed oval-track event, the Spintron can be programmed to duplicate race operation so that components can be tested for durability without requiring hugely expensive, and possibly unobtainable, track time or tying up the dyno that could be used for development.

“When we started to test the Chevy SB2 setup for NASCAR in the early days, Bob Fox went in there with a 7/16-inch, .125 wall pushrod and it smoothed out the curve,” continues Rhodey. “They were able to go back and do some step testing and basically simulate race runs from Sunday into R&D on Monday and see that the heavier pushrods were actually smoothing out the valve train and calming the harmonics. They began replacing push rods every third race as opposed to every single race.”

One of the unique benefits to engine builders is that the Spintron data can overlay on top of actual race data gathered in the vehicle. This is particularly useful for detecting patterns and isolating individual valvetrain issues.

Unlocking the secrets of engine operation is always a stimulus for new technology that improves performance. The Spintron is certainly one of the most useful tools for engine development, and the lessons learned continue to help engine builders make changes based on sound engineering and not supposition.

This article was sponsored by Trend Performance.  For more information, please visit our website at www.trendperform.com