Cylinder Bore Honing: Main Objective When Refinishing The Cylinders - Engine Builder Magazine

Cylinder Bore Honing: Main Objective When Refinishing The Cylinders

When an engine is rebuilt, the cylinders usually
need attention. Wear tends to create taper in the upper part of
the cylinder that can reduce ring sealing and increase blowby
and oil consumption if not removed. The cylinder may also be out
of round, scored or have other damage that requires correcting
before a new set of rings will seal properly.

The main objective when refinishing the cylinders
is to make the walls as straight as possible (no taper), the bores
as round as possible (minimal distortion, which is especially
important with today’s low tension rings), provide the right amount
of crosshatch for good oil retention and ring support, and produce
a surface finish that meets the requirements of the rings. This
is done by boring and/or honing the cylinders in one or several
steps with various types of abrasives (vitrified or diamond).

After honing, the cylinders need to be cleaned
to ensure removal of residual abrasive and metallic debris that’s
left in the bores. Washing and scrubbing with warm soapy water
will remove most of the unwanted material. But washing alone does
not loosen or remove surface "swarf" such as torn or
folded metal that can wear rings and delay ring seating. The only
way to get rid of this material and smooth the bores is to "polish"
the bores after honing with some type of flexible abrasive brush.

Brushing after honing not only helps clean
the bores, but can also plateau the surface depending on the characteristics
of the abrasive used. Brushing sweeps away the torn and folded
metal as well as the sharp, jagged peaks, leaving a much smoother
surface. The result is a better bore finish with little extra
effort. Another way to plateau the surface is to use very fine
#600 grit stones or cork to polish the bores after honing.

One of the advantages of a plateau bore finish
is that it preconditions or breaks-in the cylinders. Some say
this reduces the time it takes to seat a new set of rings as well
as initial ring wear, blowby and oil consumption. Others feel
it may actually increase the time required to seat new rings.
The engine delivers good compression right away, there’s no blue
smoke in the exhaust, emissions and oil consumption are reduced,
and the rings last longer because they haven’t had to wear to
conform to the bores.

A plateaued surface also provides increased
bearing area to support the rings while retaining enough depth
in the crosshatch for good oil retention and lubrication. That’s
why the original equipment engine manufacturers (OEMs) favor this
type of bore finish and use it in many new engines.

The challenges

One of the concerns expressed by OEMs who have
engine reman programs is that many aftermarket engine rebuilders
may not have the know-how or right type of honing equipment to
reproduce an OEM type of cylinder bore finish. With emissions
testing a fact of life for many motorists in many parts of the
country, the worry is that a rebuilt engine with cylinders honed
the "usual way" may not pass an emissions test. The
challenge here is to develop procedures that allow aftermarket
engine rebuilders to duplicate an OEM bore finish.

Ring manufacturers are also concerned that
some engine rebuilders may not be using the proper honing procedures
or stones for their rings. Too rough a bore finish will produce
a lot of scrubbing when the engine is initially fired up. With
prelapped rings, this isn’t good because it creates unnecessary
wear. The challenge here is to use honing procedures that produce
the best possible bore finish for a given set of rings.

Most ring manufacturers specify a #220 grit
honing abrasive for finishing the bores when using cast iron or
chrome rings because the recommended bore finish for these rings
is 28 to 35 RA (roughness average in micro inches). A #280 grit
stone is generally recommended for moly rings because moly rings
like a somewhat smoother finish of 16 to 23 RA. But these recommendations
are for conventional vitrified abrasives, not diamond.

Diamond cuts differently from a vitrified stone,
so higher numbers are generally required for an equivalent finish.
A #325 to #550 grit diamond stone may be required for the final
honing step to achieve an RA finish in the desired range. One
manufacturer we spoke with said a 500 to 550 grit diamond honing
stone will produce a surface finish in the 13 to 15 RA range.

To add to the confusion over which honing stones
may be required to produce a certain kind of finish, some vitrified
honing stones with identical grit ratings will produce different
finishes that may not always agree with the reference charts.

For example, one #220 grit vitrified stone
may produce a surface finish of 28 to 35 RA while another may
leave a much rougher finish. Differences in actual surface finish
can be due to the grading of the abrasive particles, as well as
the type and quality of lubricant used during the honing process.

The third challenge is profitability. Cylinder
bore refinishing is a time consuming and expensive step in the
engine rebuilding process. So anything that can be done to reduce
honing costs and streamline the procedure while also improving
the bore finish is a step in the right direction.


Conventional versus diamond

Many shops bore or rough hone cylinders to
within .003" of final oversize (.010" to .030"
depending on the application), then finish hone the last .003"
of the bore with #220 or #280 grit vitrified abrasives. Most shops
do not have a profilometer to measure surface finish parameters
such as RA, RK (core roughness), RPK (average peak height) and
RVK (average valley depth), bearing area and so on, so they rely
on stone grits along with the right honing pressure, head speed,
stroke rate and lubricant to achieve the desired bore finish.

Consequently, there’s no way for most shops
to know if the bore finish actually meets the requirements of
the ring manufacturer or the OEM – unless a customer complains
about excessive ring wear, blowby or oil consumption. But even
if you haven’t experienced any ring problems, it doesn’t necessarily
mean the cylinders are as good as they could or should be.

One of the limitations of vitrified abrasives
is that they wear rapidly. Depending on the grade of stones and
the hardness of the block, a set of vitrified honing stones might
do 30 V8 blocks (240-260 cylinder bores) before they’re worn out
and have to be replaced. And with each cylinder that’s honed,
the operator or equipment must compensate for stone wear to keep
the bores straight. If you fail to compensate, you can end up
with taper in the bores.

By comparison, metal bond diamond honing stones
wear very little. A set of diamond honing stones might do 300
V8 engine blocks (2,400 cylinder bores) before they have to be
replaced. The slower wear rate means the stones tend to cut straighter
(less taper) than with vitrified stones.


The slower wear rate of diamond versus vitrified
abrasives helps to more than offset the much higher initial cost
of diamond stones. Using the above figures, a set of $7 vitrified
honing stones cost about $.02 per hole if they do 240-260 cylinder
bores. A $700 set of diamond honing stones cost about $.06 per
hole if the set does 12,000 cylinder bores. The abrasive cost
per hole with diamond may be higher than that for vitrified abrasives,
but with diamonds the operator doesn’t have to stop and restart
while honing so labor costs are less.

For these reasons, many production engine remanufacturers
(PERs) have switched to diamond honing. Diamond lowers their overall
costs, saves labor (fewer stone changes), and gives better overall
bore geometry (straighter with less distortion).

Recon’s results

"We’ve had excellent results with diamond
honing," said Tom Wilson of Recon Automotive Remanufacturers,
a large PER based in Philadelphia, PA.

"The type of stones we use is dictated
by the type of rings that are going into a motor," said Wilson.
"We tried various stones before we came up with the best
combination. For an RA of 20 to 25 with moly rings, we use #325
grit diamond stones. For a finer finish in the 15 to 20 RA range,
we sometimes use #500 grit diamond stones.

"Diamond cuts differently from vitrified
abrasives. It rips the metal out and leaves a lot of microscopic
fuzz on the surface," said Wilson. "So after honing,
we brush the bores with a hand drill eight to 10 strokes. Brushing
does a good job of cleaning the debris off the surface and eliminates
any break-in period. We’ve also found that it improves the RA,
too, getting it down around 18 or so."

Wilson said Recon uses a water-based synthetic
lubricant with the diamond stones, which he said runs "clear
as water." He said the lubricant is filtered to take out
the dirt, and monitored constantly to prevent any bacteria growth.

Franklin Power Products, Inc.

"As an OEM supplier to Navistar, the only
way we can meet their cylinder bore specifications is to follow
a three-step diamond honing procedure," said Jim Ormsby of
Franklin Power Products, Inc., Franklin, IN.

Ormsby said Franklin Power Products will first
rough hone to within .005" of final size with coarse grit
#200 diamond stones. Then they final hone to size with fine grit
#600 diamonds. The last step is to brush hone the bores eight
strokes with a plateau honing tool (PHT).

"We believe we actually get a better finish
and maintain closer tolerances than the original OEM bores because
we pay close attention to every bore we do," Ormsby said.
"OEMs are not set up that way. They turn on a production
line and let it go."

Ormsby added it’s easy to be consistent with
diamond honing – provided you have the proper equipment.

Trends & recommendations

Several honing equipment suppliers we interviewed
said the trend today is towards diamond honing. Andy Rottler of
Rottler Manufacturing, Kent, WA, estimates that about 80% of the
new honing machines he’s selling are equipped with diamond stones
or are soon converted from vitrified stones to diamond once operating
in the field.

"It used to be PERs were the only ones
who would buy diamond honing equipment," said Rottler. "But
lately the smaller shops are buying it too. More and more people
are switching to diamond because it’s less expensive over the
long term, costing about one-fifth as much as vitrified abrasives
– as long as you don’t break a stone. Diamond also gives a more
consistent bore finish and better bore geometry. But to maximize
the benefits of diamond, you need a rigid hone head.

"Vitrified stones never wear at a consistent
rate," Rottler continued. "Wear can vary with the grade
of stones and the hardness of the block. It’s hard to predict
how much metal the stones are actually removing, so you have to
stop your equipment, measure the bore size, then restart the machine
to finish the cylinder. With diamond, you can set up your equipment,
turn it on and walk away. It will (automatically) hone it to the
right size."

Rottler said there is no set procedure for
honing with diamond. Procedures vary from one application to another,
and from one rebuilder to another. Many use a three-step procedure
that starts with rough honing with an aggressive grit to within
a few thousandths of final size, finish honing with a fine grit
(#325 to #550), then brushing to clean and smooth the bores.

"If you don’t use a diamond properly,
you can end up with a lot of smeared and folded metal," said
Rottler. "And if you don’t take care of the stones, they
can leave a lot of torn metal on the surface."

Rottler said brushing isn’t absolutely necessary
when honing with diamond provided you use the correct load on
the stones. The load factor will vary from one manufacturer’s
equipment to another, but generally the finish load should be
in the 30% to 35% range. For roughing, use maximum load for rapid
metal removal.

Another plus with diamond according to Rottler
is that a water-based synthetic lubricant eliminates heat as a
factor, which reduces bore distortion. "It also doesn’t stink
like mineral-based honing oils," he said.

Lyle Haley of Peterson Machine Tool, Inc.,
Shawnee Mission, KS, said the coolant is a critical factor in
using diamonds. "If the coolant mixture is off, it can affect
the finish of the bores," said Haley. "As a rule, the
concentration of a water-based synthetic should be 1-1/2% to 2%.
A refractometer should be used to monitor the concentration."

Chuck Downs of Kwik-Way Products, Marion, IA,
said a lot of people are looking at diamond to save money and
to get better results, not necessarily just to reduce honing time.

"Diamond requires a lot of pressure to
break down and cut properly, so to get the most from it you need
equipment that’s designed for diamond," said Downs. "Some
older honing machines may not work well with diamond. Newer honing
equipment typically has higher horsepower ratings and more rigid
designs to hone with diamond.

"With a lot of pressure and a multi-stone
hone head, you can remove .008" to .010" of stock per
minute with diamond," explained Downs. "The greater
the number of stones in the head, the less the pressure required
to achieve a specific rate of stock removal."

Downs said comparing grit sizes between diamond
and vitrified abrasives can be misleading. With diamond, the grit
rating is actually a concentration of diamond in the stone. The
higher the concentration, the finer the rating. A diamond stone
with a 35% concentration would be a rough honing stone and would
cut similar to an #80 grit vitrified abrasive, he said. A stone
with a 65% to 70% diamond would cut similar to a #325 grit vitrified
abrasive.

Mark Henson of LDX Genesis, Cedar Rapids, IA,
said their new honing machine was designed from the ground up
to work with diamond. The machine uses constant head pressure
(accomplished electronically with control software) to optimize
the cutting action of diamond stones in various engine applications.

"We recommend rough diamond honing with
#70 to #90 grit stones to within .002" of final bore size,
then finishing to size with #500 to #550 grit diamond stones,
followed by 10 seconds of brushing to clean the surface,"
said Henson. "With this procedure, you can achieve surface
finishes in the 13 to 15 RA range without brushing, or 6 to 8
RA with brushing."

Skip Green at Winona Van Norman, a division
of D & S Manufacturing Co., Inc., Black River Falls, WI, reported
that although they’ve received a lot of inquiries about diamond
honing, most of the aftermarket is still using vitrified abrasives
ñ except for PERs. "It takes a honing machine built
for heavy-duty use to handle diamonds," Green said.

"Many shops are using a plateau finishing
procedure, but are doing it with vitrified stones and a brush.
The typical shop has to work on such a wide variety of engines
and bore sizes that diamonds are too expansive," said Green.

Honing tests

Ed Kiebler of Sunnen Products Co., St. Louis,
MO, said some ring manufacturers have not been in favor of diamond
honing because diamonds can leave torn and fragmented metal on
the surface.

"Diamond is a dull particle and is bonded
so tightly that it takes a lot of pressure to hone a bore,"
explained Kiebler. "Consequently, it tears up the surface
and needs to be followed up with a PHT (plateau honing tool) to
clean away the debris. If you’re going to use diamond, we recommend
a two-step honing procedure that uses a brush to clean the cylinders
after honing. We recommend using a brush in a hone head fixture
to put a controlled amount of pressure on the brush."

Kiebler said Sunnen recently conducted a series
of tests for a ring manufacturer to see which honing procedure
produced a bore finish that most closely matched their requirements.
The ring manufacturer’s bore finish requirements for a one-step
honing procedure are 10 to 20 RA, 40 to 60 RK, 10 to 20 RPK and
35 to 65 RVK, or 10 to 20 RA, 30 to 50 RK, 5 to 20 RPK and 50
to 100 RVK for a two-step procedure.

One cylinder was honed using a one-step procedure
with #500 grit diamond only (no brushing). The results were RA
13, RK 40, RPK 18 and RVK 17. The results were not considered
satisfactory because of the low RVK number (which reduces the
cylinder wall’s ability to hold and retain oil for proper ring
lubrication).

A second cylinder was honed using a two-step
procedure: #220 grit diamond followed with a #120 grit plateau
honing tool (brush). The results were 20 RA, 44 RK, 16 RPK and
66 RVK. These results were considered well within the ring manufacturer’s
requirements.

A third cylinder was honed using #400 grit
diamond, followed by brushing with a #320 grit plateau honing
tool. The results were RA 13, RK 35, RPK 11 and RVK 33. The results
were again outside the ring manufacturer’s specifications because
the RVK valve of 33 was too low.

"Our tests show that you can get the same
bore finish with #500 grit diamond as you can with #320 grit vitrified
abrasive, provided you follow up with a brush," said Kiebler.
"We also think that if you’re rough honing with diamond,
you should leave a little more metal (.005") for finish honing
than with vitrified stones (.003"). Rough honing with a #80
to #100 diamond will leave a surface finish that’s over 100 RA.
Rough honing with #80 grit vitrified abrasive will leave a surface
finish of around 60 RA.

"As for speed, diamond honing can be just
as fast as boring a cylinder," offered Kiebler. "With
an eight stone head at 450 rpm, 80% to 90% pressure, and 80 strokes
per minute, you can achieve a stock removal rate of .020"
per minute," he said.

You May Also Like

The Road to AAPEX Season 2, Ep 2

This year’s Road to AAPEX is a tale of two roads: One metaphorical, paved with questions that face the automotive aftermarket like the impact of EV adoption and sustainability efforts; and one quite literal, that was paved at the start of the 20th century and conceptualized the first transcontinental highway. The Lincoln Highway, which begins

This year’s Road to AAPEX is a tale of two roads: One metaphorical, paved with questions that face the automotive aftermarket like the impact of EV adoption and sustainability efforts; and one quite literal, that was paved at the start of the 20th century and conceptualized the first transcontinental highway. The Lincoln Highway, which begins in Times Square, New York City, and stretches to the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California, was the first designed with automobiles in mind.

The Road to AAPEX Season 2, Ep 1

Last year, the idea was simple: Find a junker, fix it up with the best from the automotive aftermarket, and drive it to Las Vegas for AAPEX 2022. This year, it’s anything but simple. Related Articles – What’s a Ford Sidevalve Engine? – The Drag & Drive Revolution – The Evolution of Pro Mod Diesels

What’s a Ford Sidevalve Engine?

It looks like an ordinary inline 4-cylinder flathead engine. Essentially it is, but it has quite a cult following here in the UK.

The Drag & Drive Revolution

Following that first drag-and-drive event back in 2005, spinoffs of Drag Week have been happening all over the country, and the world, both large and small. In recent years, the trend has been completely blowing up!

The Evolution of Pro Mod Diesels

The advancements within the performance diesel world over the past 20 years have been nothing short of phenomenal. In fact, within just the last five to 10 years, that progress has been even more rapid and impressive, but few progressions have been more astonishing than those within the Pro Mod Diesel realm.

Other Posts

Top Fuel and Funny Car Engines

They’re the pinnacle of drag racing, and the engine builders, crew chiefs and teams who make these cars function at peak performance all season long are looking at every single area of the engine and the car to make it down the track as fast as possible.

Race Oils

Choosing the correct performance racing oil is essential to ensure optimal performance and longevity of your engine.

Facts About Engine Bearings

The experts all agree that cleanliness is the most important factor during installation, and the lack thereof is the most common problem that leads to bearing failure. But measuring is just as critical.

Does Connecting Rod Length Matter?

Over the years, we’ve gotten asked numerous times about connecting rod length and the impact that has on an engine’s horsepower and durability. As it turns out, this question is often overthought. It’s not so much the connecting rod length that matters as much as it is the correct piston pin height. The connecting rod