Understanding High Performance Valvetrain Technology - Engine Builder Magazine
Connect with us
Close Sidebar Panel Open Sidebar Panel

Features

Understanding High Performance Valvetrain Technology

Advertisement

Parts are getting lighter, stronger and capable of producing more horsepower than ever before. One of the driving forces behind these advances has been the proliferation of aftermarket cylinder heads that require unique valvetrain components. In addition, new computer-aided design, modeling and manufacturing techniques are making it easier and faster for valvetrain component suppliers to develop new parts in record time. Add to this recent advances in materials science and coatings technology and you can see why engine builders have a much broader range of valvetrain products from which to choose when building a performance engine.

Click Here to Read More
Advertisement

PUTTING THE VALVETRAIN ON A DIET

Weight is always a major factor to consider when choosing individual valvetrain components. Less weight is almost always better because it lessens the load on the valve springs, and allows the engine to turn more rpms for more top end power.

Every gram of weight reduction in the valvetrain adds 35 to 40 rpm potential to the engine. So a weight reduction of 10 grams could theoretically add 350 to 400 more rpm to the engine with no other changes to the valvetrain (same springs, etc.).

Yet if valvetrain components are lightened too much, it increases the risk of bending or breaking something. Consequently, you want the lightest possible parts that are still strong enough to handle the valve spring pressures and rpms the engine will generate.

Advertisement

One way to trim weight is to replace steel valvetrain components with ones made from lighter materials such as aluminum or titanium. These include forged or billet aluminum rocker arms, titanium valve spring retainers, titanium valves, even titanium springs.

Aluminum rocker arms typically provide some reduction in weight over stock stamped steel rocker arms, and increased durability. Most have needle bearing fulcrums and roller tips to minimize friction and wear. When the stock steel rockers are replaced with aluminum rockers, the same lift ratio will often add an extra 15 to 40 horsepower due to friction reduction alone. If a higher lift ratio is used, even more power can be squeezed from the engine by increasing the effective lift of the camshaft.

Advertisement

Increasing the lift ratio adds horsepower with little or no loss in low rpm torque, idle quality or vacuum. By opening and closing the valves at a faster rate, the engine flows more air for the same number of degrees of valve duration. High lift rocker arms also reduce the amount of lifter travel needed to open the valves, which reduces friction and the inertia of the lifters and pushrods that must be overcome by the valve springs to close the valves.

By analyzing the stresses and loads on rocker arms with fancy computer programs (finite element analysis), manufacturers are finding new ways to CNC machine out even more weight without sacrificing strength or durability. The result is an even better product that can withstand higher spring pressures and rpms.

Advertisement

Randy Becker Jr. of Harland Sharp Custom Speed Parts Mfg. Co., in Strongsville, OH, says his company will be expanding its “Diamond Series” of superlight rocker arms by adding rockers for small block Chevys in early 2007. “We came out with the lightweight Diamond Series rockers for big block Chevys about a year ago, and now we’re going to offer the same thing for small blocks. The rockers are machined at 45° in low stressed areas to remove 8 to 10 grams of weight. The Diamond Series rockers will be available in stock ratios and higher ratios. Most people want the higher lift ratios. I’d say they outsell the stock ratios by a margin of 10 to 1,” says Becker.


SHAFT MOUNTED ROCKERS

Another change that’s taking place in rocker arms today is a move back to shaft mounted rockers. As spring pressures go up, stud mounted rockers tend to flex and break. Installing a stud girdle over the rockers adds extra support and rigidity to the valvetrain, but also interferes with valve adjustments and requires taller valve covers.

Advertisement

Shaft mounted rockers, by comparison, are stronger because the shaft provides the same kind of rigid support as a stud girdle. The shaft also holds the rockers in better alignment, eliminating the need for a separate guide plate for the pushrods. This reduces flex in the valvetrain at high rpm for better valve control. The shaft can also supply oil pressure to the rockers to improve lubrication, and reduce friction by lowering the pivot point of the rockers slightly with respect to the valves and pushrods. The improved geometry of shaft-mounted rockers reduces friction between the tips of the arms and top of the valves, and is typically good for an extra 15 to 20 horsepower with no other changes.

Advertisement

Dave Grob of Jesel Inc., Lakewood, NJ, says his company has added 50 new rocker arm kits to its product line this year. These include new applications for the beam-style J2K rockers, Pro Series rockers, Comp Series rockers and Sportsman Series rockers.

Jesel uses a unique rocker design that mounts the rockers on short individual beams rather than a long rocker shaft. The needle-bearing aluminum rockers are mounted on CNC machined billet steel stands, and are available in various offsets and lift ratios of up to 2.4:1, which are used by some NASCAR and Pro Stock drag racers.

“High lift rockers are popular with a lot of people, but we’re also seeing a trend back to lower rocker ratios in some cases. Valve spring suppliers today are offering springs that can deliver up to 500 lbs. of closed seat pressure and 1,500 lbs. of open pressure. So going with a lower ratio rocker reduces the load on the pushrods, lifters and cam lobes.”

Advertisement

Grob said Jesel is also introducing two new steel rockers in its Pro Series line, including CNC 4-axis machined lightweight J25 steel rockers for applications that require extra strength, and CNC 5-axis machined J35 steel rockers which were originally developed for NASCAR. He says the steel rockers are actually lighter than many aluminum rockers and have a lower moment of inertia.

Another new product from Jesel is steel overhead cam followers for Ford OHC engines. The redesigned followers can be installed without having to remove the camshafts.

For demanding high heat applications, T & D Machine has a new line of lightweight steel rockers for exhaust valves. “These are primarily for endurance applications where fatigue life is essential,” said Loren Kreck. “The rockers are a little heavier than aluminum rockers, but their rotational force numbers are about the same. The rockers are available in a range of lift ratios, and can be used with standard pushrods.”

Advertisement

WHERE WEIGHT REDUCTION HELPS THE MOST

Reducing the weight of the rockers reduces the reciprocating mass of the valvetrain. But weight reductions on the valve side of the rockers usually has more of an impact on the engine’s rpm potential than weight reductions on the pushrod side. Here’s why: the offset of the rocker arm creates a leverage effect that multiplies weight savings on the valve side by the rocker lift ratio. On a small block Chevy with a stock rocker arm ratio of 1.5:1, every gram of weight removed on the valve side is worth 150% of any weight savings on the pushrod side.

Advertisement

Consequently, cutting 6 grams of weight from the valve side of the valvetrain by using lightweight valve spring retainers or lighter valves has the same net effect as cutting 4 grams of weight from the lifters or pushrods.

Higher rpms require stiffer valve springs and/or multiple valve springs which place greater loads on the rockers, pushrods, lifters and cam lobes. So reducing valvetrain weight means you can achieve the same rpm with less spring pressure, less friction and less wear.

PUSHROD FLEX

As spring pressures go up, so does the need for stronger, stiffer pushrods to prevent the pushrods from bending like pretzels. Yet some engine builders are reluctant to use heavier, thickwall pushrods because of the slight increase in weight. As we said earlier, weight on the valve side of the rockers has more of an impact on valvetrain loading and engine rpm than weight on the pushrod side. Consequently, the slight increase in weight provided by heavier thickwall pushrods is more than offset by the gains in reliability and valve control they provide.

Advertisement

Pushrods flex quite a bit at high rpm. Under a strobe light on a Spintron machine, some pushrods behave like a pole vaulter’s pole. As the lifter comes up and shoves the pushrod up against the rocker, the pushrod deflects slightly as it overcomes pressure exerted against the rocker by the valve spring. As the valve reaches maximum lift, the deflection in the pushrod snaps back like a spring giving the valve a little extra push. This can actually cause the valve to open a bit further than it would otherwise, increasing valve lift a bit more than expected. Under controlled conditions this can actually provide a little extra power. But in most instances, pushrod deflection creates harmonics in the valvetrain that disrupt valve timing and control causing a loss of power. It also increases the risk of the pushrod bending or breaking.

Advertisement

The strength of the pushrods can be increased by switching to thicker wall tubing (.060″, .080″, .130″, etc.) and/or by going to a larger diameter or tapered pushrods. But on many engines, the size of the pushrods is restricted by the guideplates on the cylinder head.

A totally different approach has been taken by Schumann Sales & Service with its new “bimetal” aluminum/steel pushrods. “By pressing a special high strength aluminum alloy tube inside a standard .065″ wall thickness chrome-moly pushrod, we make the pushrod significantly stronger and 30 to 40 percent lighter than a comparable thickwall pushrod,” said Vern Schumann. “It gives you the best weight to strength ratio of any pushrod that’s on the market.”

Advertisement

The special aluminum alloy that Schumann uses is a proprietary formula with a heat treatment that allows the inner tube alone to support up to 800 psi. When surrounded by the outer chrome-moly tube, the strength of the aluminum/steel bimetal pushrod is three times that of a standard chrome-moly pushrod.

Another feature of the new bimetal pushrod is improved lubrication for the rockers. The inner tube has a hole .090″ in diameter that speeds oil flow to the rockers. “In a conventional pushrod, the inside is never 100 percent filled with oil. There is always 10 to 20 percent air inside, and the up and down motion of the pushrod aerates the oil. Our tube provides a solid column of oil straight from the lifter to the rocker,” said Schumann.

Advertisement

The new bimetal rockers will be available in 2007 for popular small block Chevy and Ford engines, with custom lengths available for other engines. “A customer of ours used these new bimetal pushrods to set an NHRA class record of 9.82 seconds in the quarter mile with his Mustang, said Schumann.

LIGHTER VALVES, SPRINGS & RETAINERS

Weight on the valve side of the rockers can be reduced a number of ways. One is to use intake and exhaust valves with smaller diameter stems. Another is to use valves with hollow stems, or if your customer has the bucks, to install lightweight titanium valves and valve spring retainers. Titanium valves are typically 40 percent lighter than steel valves, and titanium retainers are usually half the weight of stock steel retainers (7 grams versus 14 grams).


One of the tradeoffs of switching to lighter materials such as titanium to reduce weight is that titanium is extremely expensive, and is getting more expensive as time goes on. Not everybody can afford valves that cost $90 or more apiece, or retainers that cost $170 a set.

Titanium valve tips and stems are often coated, especially on street applications, to improve lubricity and reduce the risk of stem galling. A steel insert may also be welded or pressed into the tip of the valve to reduce wear, or a hardened steel cap may be used on the end of the valve. Stem coatings may be plasma spray moly or a similar friction-reducing material, or a thin film coating such as diamond-like carbon (DLC), titanium nitride (TiN), or chromium nitride (CrN) applied by a physical or chemical vapor deposition process. Thin film coatings are lighter than sprayed coatings by up to 4 grams, and do not change tolerances as much. Hard thin film coatings such as diamond-like carbon are only 20 microns thick, yet are extremely durable.

Advertisement

Though titanium valves can be used with cast iron intake seats and nickel-steel exhaust seats, more expensive beryllium copper seats provide the best cooling and durability. Beryllium copper seats have a yellow or gold appearance, and typically contains about 2 percent beryllium (though some alloys contain only 0.2 to 0.6 percent beryllium).

The alloy conducts heat better than steel alloys or cast iron. But beryllium is a toxic metal, so care must be used to avoid inhaling any dust when machining the seats.

For the top class professional racers, the extra cost of titanium is just a cost of doing business and their sponsors will pay for it. But for street racers or the Saturday night racer who pays the bulk of his own expenses, titanium is an exotic luxury – and class rules often prohibit the use of exotic materials on local dirt tracks to keep costs down.

Advertisement

Some manufacturers are now reintroducing redesigned steel parts as a lower-cost alternative to titanium. These include new lightweight steel valve spring retainers, hollow stem stainless steel valves, and even steel exhaust rocker arms.

Chris Douglas at Competition Cams, Memphis, TN said his company just introduced a new line of lightweight steel retainers at the SEMA show. They are a lower cost alternative to titanium retainers, and almost as light.

Hollow stem stainless steel valves are another affordable alternative to titanium valves. The hollow stems are made by drilling out the top two-thirds of the valve stem, micro polishing the inside of the stem to remove stress risers, and welding a hardened tip on the top of the stem. The result is a valve that weighs 20 to 22 percent less than a conventional stainless steel valve.

Advertisement

The weight reduction is typically good for 300 to 350 more rpm with no other modifications (same springs, rockers, pushrods, etc.). What’s more, the valves are just as durable as conventional valves in naturally aspirated performance engines.

But hollow stem valve may not be recommended for turbocharged or supercharged engines, or ones boosted by nitrous oxide because of the extra heat.

CHANGING SPRINGS

More weight savings can also be found by replacing conventional valve springs with titanium springs or beehive springs. Like titanium valves and retainers, titanium springs are expensive but do offer a significant weight savings. Titanium allows the spring not only to be lighter overall but to use larger diameter wire with fewer coils. This allows a titanium spring to handle more valve lift without coil bind.

Advertisement

The reduced mass and inertia of a titanium spring increase the natural frequency of the spring to reduce harmonics at higher rpms. Titanium also has a lower torsional modulus than steel which makes it more springy than steel. Consequently, the springs hold their pressure longer and resist taking a set at elevated temperatures. So for high revving performance engines, titanium springs offer some significant advantages.

A more affordable alternative for street engines and budget-minded racers is steel beehive springs. Beehive springs gradually taper towards the top. This reduces the mass in the critical upper half of the spring, and allows the use of a smaller and lighter spring retainer. The shape of the spring also creates a progressive spring rate that alters the spring’s harmonics and allows it to handle higher rpms in many cases without the valve bouncing or floating.
Chris Douglas said Competition Cams has also added more new beehive spring applications to their product line. He said beehive springs can increase the rpm potential of a engine 100 to 1,200 rpm depending on the cam, valvetrain and other engine modifications. The maximum amount of valve lift their beehive springs can handle is .650 inches, so if the engine needs more lift it will require conventional dual or triple springs.

Advertisement

Beehive springs have been popular on the street, and for engines that run single valve springs. But some racers are cautious about using them because there’s no safety margin if a spring breaks. With a double or triple spring, the engine won’t suck a valve if a spring fails.

Of course, regular springs continue to improve, too. Rick Simko of Elgin Industries, Elgin, IL said his company added 25 new performance valve spring applications this year. “Our springs are made of chrome silicon with vanadium, which improves the spring’s ability to retain its stiffness for much better longevity than other springs. We have both single and dual spring sets, as well as some new beehive style springs.”

Advertisement

LIFTERS

At the bottom end of the valvetrain, the lifters bear the brunt of the pressure exerted by the springs. Reducing the weight of the lifters is also beneficial for increasing rpm. But another trick that can help high end power in engines with hydraulic roller lifters is to reduce the distance the plunger travels inside the lifters. Reducing plunger travel reduces lifter pump up at high rpm. Chris Douglas said Competition Cams new R-Series roller lifters have reduced plunger travel for that very reason. He said stiffer, heavier pushrods tend to collapse the lifter plungers at higher speeds, so reducing plunger travel within the lifter add another 200 to 400 rpm to the top end. Douglas said the new lifters will be available in early 2007.

Advertisement

NEW FINISHING PROCESS

Mark Campbell of Crane Cams, Daytona Beach FL, said Crane’s recent purchase by Mikronite Technologies has enabled them to apply a new surface finishing process to their valvetrain components. The process is similar to shot peening but is done in a high energy vessel under tightly controlled conditions. The Mikronite process compresses the surface of the metal and leaves a high polished mirror finish that significantly increases the strength of the part.

“It makes rocker arms stronger, reduces wear on cam lobes, and makes valve springs last two to four times longer. The Mikronite process relieves stress in the metal and reduces friction.”
Crane will also be introducing a new camshaft lobe profile in 2007 for competition use that allows engines to achieve higher rpms, or endurance engines to achieve the same rpm with less spring pressure. Douglas said in a typical sprint car application, the spring pressure can be reduced from 270 lbs. to 210 lbs. with no loss of rpm. “The key to our new camshaft technology is reworking lobe ramps to reduce spring harmonics,” said Campbell.

Advertisement
Connect
Engine Builder Magazine